A website that brings in clients , not just visits.

I charge €700 per working day, and each format starts from a known number of days. So you have an order of magnitude before the first call, not after three meetings. The amounts below are starting points: they cover the format as described.

What moves the amount: the number of pages, how custom the design is and the connections to your tools. Not the number of meetings. In Brussels, the Digitalisation Grant can fund 25 to 70% of that budget.

One week for a landing page, one to two for a showcase website, eight to ten for a website with a CMS. The calendar depends above all on one thing: how fast your content and your approvals arrive.

I work on two projects at a time at most. In practice, your project does not wait in a queue: the start date I announce is the one that holds.

Because on a site under twenty-five pages, an agency bills you for a structure you only use part of. The rest of the time the agency is the right call, and I say so when that is the case.

The real risk with a freelance is depending on one person. I answer that concretely: the code lives in your repository from day one, it uses mainstream technologies, and it is documented so another developer can take over.

Start from what you have to publish and what the site has to produce, not from the number of pages you picture.

A format can change along the way: a landing page that works becomes the first brick of a showcase website, without starting over.

That depends on where your buyers are, not on the country's language map. A Brussels SME whose clients are in Brussels and Wallonia lives perfectly well in French alone.

Dutch makes sense when you prospect in Flanders, when you answer federal public tenders, or when your direct competitors are already positioned there. English makes sense for a product sold outside Belgium. In both cases, a translation without semantic work returns nothing: I start from the words people actually type in each language. Count from €1,400 for a second language on a showcase website.

The foundations, yes, and they are not an option. Site tree, tags, structured data, sitemap, internal links, loading speed: all of it happens during the build, because adding it afterwards costs more than doing it properly the first time.

What is not included is the ranking work over time: content production, competitive analysis, inbound links, monthly position tracking. That is a job in its own right, described on the SEO and GEO page. A well-built site puts you in a decent starting position; it does not replace six months of content.

The question is not how old the site is but what is holding it back. Some signals justify starting over, others get fixed in a few days.

During the twenty-five minute audit, I tell you which column you are in. Sometimes I conclude that a redesign is not justified.

You do, entirely, from day one. The code lives in your repository, the domain name is in your name, the hosting credentials are yours. There is no licence to renew and no platform holding your pages hostage.

That is what makes leaving possible: if you want to hand the next stage to someone else, they get a standard, documented project, not a system only I would understand.

Yes. I am based in Brussels and most of my clients are here, but the method and the rates are the same in Liège, Namur, Antwerp or France. We work over video calls, with a visit on site when it is worth it.

The only thing that changes outside the Brussels Region is the funding: the Digitalisation Grant is a Brussels scheme. In Wallonia, it is the chèques-entreprises, with their own conditions.

Yes. The sites are hosted on European servers and collect nothing superfluous. Forms ask for explicit consent, the privacy policy is built in, and no data goes to an undeclared third party.

If your activity involves sensitive data or a particular kind of processing, we discuss it during scoping so the architecture is compliant from the start. Fixing that after launch always costs more.