SEO & GEO Agentic GEO: how to prepare your website for AI agents in 2026
Sebastien Balieu
Mar 20, 2026
A well-ranked page brings in enquiries months after it was written. Your acquisition cost falls as the traffic climbs, instead of starting from zero again.
Someone typing "Laravel developer Brussels" is not at the same stage as someone seeing an ad between two videos. Those visitors turn into meetings far more often.
Generative engines like ChatGPT answer by quoting a handful of sources. Being structured to be among them puts you ahead of competitors who have not even looked at the question yet.
At Nallian we build solutions that are trusted by the world's leading airports, ground handlers and logistics companies. But our website no longer reflected that level of excellence. This redesign ensures our first impression matches the quality of…
Jean Verheyen
CEO • Nallian
Numinam's technical and design vision has enabled us to improve our lead generation flows. A big step forward.
Jérôme Van De Sande
Product & Data Leader • Heat Me
Speed, indexing, URL structure, structured data, blocking errors. That is the layer that decides whether the rest of the work is worth anything.
Your real keywords, their volumes in Belgium and the intent behind each query. A French volume measured on France says nothing about your market.
What your competitors rank for and where the ground is free. Attacking a query already held by three large players is rarely the right start.
Pillar pages, articles, comparison pages, with a production order. You know what to write, in what order, and why.
I get my hands into the site, I do not deliver a list of recommendations for somebody else to execute. That is the advantage of a consultant who codes.
Positions, organic traffic, pages on the rise and presence in AI answers. A short report you read in five minutes.
This site ranks using the method I sell you. These articles are its raw material.
01 Complete audit
02 Semantic mapping
03 Technical fixes
04 Content production
05 Measurement and adjustment
I charge €595 per working day. The audit is a finished deliverable you can take elsewhere; the retainer is a volume of days reserved every month.
Be wary of offers under €500 per month. Below a certain budget, the volume of work produced is not enough to move positions.
The audit is a finished deliverable, billed once. The retainer is a volume of days reserved every month: that volume is what determines how fast your positions move.
| Service | Budget | What it includes |
|---|---|---|
| SEO and GEO audit | from €1,785 (3 days) | Technical, semantic, competition, costed plan |
| Monthly retainer | from €1,200 / month | Fixes applied, optimisation, report |
| Retainer with content | from €2,500 / month | The above, plus production and inbound links |
Below €500 per month, the volume of work produced is not enough to move positions. An offer at that price funds an automated report at best.
Faster than you usually hear on the technical side, slower on the content side. Here is what actually happens, month after month.
| Horizon | What you can expect |
|---|---|
| Weeks 1 to 4 | Technical fixes, pages finally indexed, speed restored |
| Months 2 to 3 | First positions on low-competition and local queries |
| Months 4 to 6 | Organic traffic visibly rising, first attributable enquiries |
| Months 6 to 12 | Positions on competitive queries, citations in AI answers |
That calendar assumes regular production. Two months without content do not push the curve back by two months, they push it down.
SEO targets a position in a list of results. GEO targets a citation in an answer written by an AI. The two overlap widely, but not completely.
| SEO | GEO | |
|---|---|---|
| Target | Google, Bing | ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI overviews |
| Signals | Links, authority, relevance, speed | Factual clarity, structure, consistency across sources |
| Content format | Pages targeting an intent | Direct answers, structured data, tables |
| Measurement | Positions and traffic | Citation frequency on your typical queries |
A site invisible on Google is also invisible in AI answers: the models lean heavily on what the engines already rank. GEO is therefore not a replacement, it is an extra layer.
With numbers that exist before the work starts, to avoid the report celebrating progress nobody can verify.
| Metric | Tool | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|
| Positions per keyword | Rank tracking | Where you stand on your target queries |
| Impressions and clicks | Google Search Console | What Google already shows of you |
| Organic traffic per page | Analytics | Which pages are actually working |
| Enquiries attributed to organic | Forms and CRM | The only metric that pays your invoices |
| Citations in AI answers | Typical queries replayed | Your presence in generative engines |
The last row is the one that counts. Traffic that doubles without a single extra enquiry signals a content or journey problem, not a success.
Only if you sell in Flanders. Otherwise the budget is better spent on depth in French: two half-worked languages are worth less than one well-held language.
When Dutch is justified, I start from the queries people actually type in Dutch rather than translating your French pages. Search intent differs from one language to the other, and a literal translation rarely ranks.
The question to ask is about execution: who is actually going to change your site, and how fast.
| Freelance consultant | SEO agency | |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | No overhead to carry | Overhead passed on |
| Technical fixes | Applied directly | Handed to your developer |
| Content volume | Limited by one person | High, several writers |
| Who you talk to | The person doing the work | An account manager |
| When it is the right call | SME, site to fix, fast decisions | High content volumes, several markets |
My advantage comes down to one thing: I fix the site myself. Most audit recommendations die because nobody implements them.
Almost never. On an existing site, most of the quick wins come from pages already written that do not target the right intent, or that compete with each other on the same subject.
The audit sorts your pages into three piles: to optimise, to merge, to delete. Deleting pages often lifts the rest of the site.
The two do not play at the same moment. Ads buys visibility right now, SEO builds it and keeps it.
| SEO | Google Ads | |
|---|---|---|
| Cost over time | An investment that compounds | A spend that restarts every month |
| Time before results | 2 to 6 months | Immediate |
| Durability | Traffic stays after you stop | Traffic stops with the budget |
| Control over volume | Gradual | Adjustable day by day |
For an SME starting out, the healthiest combination is often Ads on a landing page while SEO builds up, then a gradual reduction of the advertising budget.
What I learned on the subject, written down in black and white.
Twenty-five minutes to look at your current positions, your competitors and what the AIs say about your sector.
You leave with the three fixes to make first. It is free, no strings attached, and it is me on the phone.
Calendar not showing? Open it in a new tab